Performance Results


Gaming 184% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 183% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 146 2-Core 271 95% 170 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 979 92% 764 Pts	64-Core 1,483 92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% MSI(1462 3890) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	191% Outstanding	Lighting 275 Reflection 258 Parallax 289 224% 274 fps	MRender 327 Gravity 234 Splatting 176 193% 245 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB 9,415 User benchmarks, average bench 289% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5M2QEXF7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 746 727 722 719 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,666 Write 2,333 Mixed 1,465 SusWrite 644 344% 1,527 MB/s	4K Read 57.6 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 77.1 252% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,271 DQ Write 946 DQ Mixed 1,081 816% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 380%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 110 111 110 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 77.3 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 108 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 177% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 415GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 105 106 105 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 132 Write 137 Mixed 103 SusWrite 106 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 2x16GB 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 29.3 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 43.5 SC Mixed 28.5 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	35x
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	35x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	20x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	10x
S3 4T00 4TBSandiskBench 99%, 1,397 samples	3x

RAM
LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 2x16GBTigoBench 90%, 1,005 samples	21x
LV32D4U2S8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 93%, 341 samples	8x
CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 029E CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 64GBUnknownBench 81%, 4 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16