Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 89%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Memory 14.5
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 37.1
15% 25.9 Pts
4-Core 72
8-Core 100
11% 86.2 Pts
64-Core 97.6
6% 97.6 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 86.4
38% 58.8 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 0.2
18% 25.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 31%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 73 82 95 78 85 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.9% Very poor
Read 181
Write 179
Mixed 141
SusWrite 87.8
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 6.2
20% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
427GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 89 111 141 150 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 74
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 124
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 364
11% 364 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback