Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160520
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 552
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 38.7
31% 39.4 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.8
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20100P00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 367
Mixed 310
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 185
181% 288 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
331GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 142 143 142 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 141
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4721G8CKHH6DFSDS 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 34.3
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 22.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback