Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo CI581128TBSEFI  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo NB50TH
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 94
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 704
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 55A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 38.7
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 26.3
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D58 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 603 257 342 388 343 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 2,290
Write 613
Mixed 728
SusWrite 368
218% 1,000 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 41.6
143% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 279
294% 506 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 186%
Great: 291%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
270GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 420 408 313 377 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 421
Write 349
Mixed 378
SusWrite 392
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 18.3
84% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 29.8
64% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%
Im2p33f3 NVMe ADATA 256GB
152GB free
Firmware: 92004281 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 356 174 158 133 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,503
Write 819
Mixed 588
SusWrite 307
177% 804 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 16.2
117% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 459
356% 503 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 135%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 28.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CI581128TBSEFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback