Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 188F
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120829
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '22 at 11:29
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za) 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 51.3 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 39.6 26% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 39.7 8-Core 37 5% 38.3 Pts	64-Core 39.2 2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340G 88 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 188F) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.1000 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.83 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 250G 250GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 172 174 174 144 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.2% Below average	Read 206 Write 193 Mixed 191 SusWrite 168 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 13.1 43% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 86.6 DQ Mixed 93.9 71% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB 5,165 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 5.4 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 4.3 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1,400x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	803x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	285x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 2x4GBAdataBench 46%, 2,021 samples	113x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	110x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	109x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80