Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 03:52
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 294
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,094
100% 840 Pts
64-Core 2,230
138% 2,230 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 279
Parallax 425
173% 305 fps
MRender 412
Gravity 191
Splatting 303
245% 302 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 178%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2315 2289 2189 1917 1483 1473 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,418
Write 2,324
Mixed 1,604
SusWrite 1,944
466% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 81.6
285% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 414
406% 660 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 338%
Great: 431%
WDC WDS5 00G1B0A-00H9 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 306 307 307 306 304 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
Read 357
Write 337
Mixed 205
SusWrite 308
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 26.2
87% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 105
88% 126 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 65%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
439GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 382 383 383 384 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 383
Mixed 350
SusWrite 383
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 42.8
139% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 0.3
46% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 45.3
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 40.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback