Samsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP500R5N-X02HK
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170921
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 02:37
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 147
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 310
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Sanyo(144D C792) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7987
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 6.3
5% 4.53 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT22K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 143 81 78 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 425
Write 358
Mixed 357
SusWrite 98.2
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 28.2
125% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 131
115% 177 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
909GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 472 395 395 369 287 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback