| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150514 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '22 at 14:54 |
| Run Duration | 263 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49.7%
Average
|
39% 55.9 Pts
|
20% 158 Pts
|
19% 312 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.4%
Below average
|
33% 44.9 fps
|
38% 47.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
303GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 75 79 76 79 81 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
63% 87.4 MB/s
|
113% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 48 28 33 68 68 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
34% 46.1 MB/s
|
29% 0.23 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
136GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 79 76 79 81 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
54% 74.2 MB/s
|
111% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DCLT4GN568S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.5%
Above average
|
60% 20.8 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
46% 86.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,128 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 1,186x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 503x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 492x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 566x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 479x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 413x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $287 |