Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core 210 User benchmarks, average bench 12% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Memory 3.29 1-Core 32 2-Core 63.8 16% 33 Pts	4-Core 95.7 8-Core 95.4 13% 95.6 Pts	64-Core 95 6% 95 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 22%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% ASRock(1849 03D0) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 105 96 14 14 19 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.8% Poor	Read 165 Write 87.7 Mixed 73 SusWrite 62.1 21% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 20.4 55% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 30 25% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 319GB free Firmware: GM4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 81 82 81 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 69 Write 73.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 78.6 49% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 2048, 512 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 471 8% 471 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom 9650AMD $125Bench 43%, 2,698 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+AMDBench 37%, 5,400 samples	1x
Phenom 9750AMDBench 44%, 1,906 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples	2x
SUV400S3712 120GBKingstonBench 34%, 503 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16