Medion E15408

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E15408  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS15IC
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 10:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 102
44% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 135
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E39 A027) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.97 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S41CF512G 512GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 242 281 227 340 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 372
Write 306
Mixed 242
SusWrite 259
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 13.4
56% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 28.5
42% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E15408 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E15408

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback