Acer Nitro AN715-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN715-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Citigo_CFS
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200409
Uptime81.8 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 04:34
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 183
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 471
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1336) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.6% Good
Lighting 83.7
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 77.3
68% 83.7 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 72.4
66% 82.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 250 260 260 235 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 664
Write 262
Mixed 301
SusWrite 247
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 25.4
104% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 302
234% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88%
Great: 136%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
394GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 48.6
Write 81.7
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 99.7
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
140% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN715-51 Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN715-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback