HP 550-109np

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 550-109np  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 00:26
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 116
45% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 185
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 5
Parallax 11.7
4% 7.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 6.2
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 353 378 369 390 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 312
Write 290
Mixed 300
SusWrite 368
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 28.2
104% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 149
127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
833GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 161 159 163 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 80.4
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 160
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-109np Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-109np

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback