HP 27-k127c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 27-k127c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFA
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 19:27
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4765T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 399
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 730A
HP(103C 2AFA) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1972
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.37 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 256GB 256GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
825GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 32 53 84 77 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 85.6
Write 93.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 66.3
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 27-k127c Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 27-k127c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $78
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback