Galaxy B450M Ver1.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGalaxy B450M Ver1.0  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX GALAX B450M Ver1.0
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 18:15
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 253
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 825
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 7.3
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geonix-SSD/480GB 480GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 401 415 414 414 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 486
Write 14.1
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 409
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 12.1
63% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 16.1
42% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Ver1.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Galaxy B450M Ver1.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback