HP 24-b017c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP 24-b017c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B7
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 304
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81B7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 28 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 172
Write 27.6
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 24.8
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A5143EB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-b017c Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-b017c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback