HP PX722AA-ABA M7167C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP PX722AA-ABA M7167C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek LIMESTONE
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 02:52
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.20GHz-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 29
2-Core 54.9
34% 49 Pts
4-Core 57.1
8-Core 56.5
8% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 57.4
4% 57.4 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B 9498) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 101 103 108 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 236
Write 179
Mixed 140
SusWrite 103
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 19.3
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 23
22% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
276GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 103 103 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 104
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB
244GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 13.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 51.7
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 37%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB-$117
107GB free
Firmware: YAR51GW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 55
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 51.8
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PX722AA-ABA M7167C Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP PX722AA-ABA M7167C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback