Packard IPOWER 8006

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard IPOWER 8006  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard GA-K8N Ultra-SLI
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051212
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 22:43
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 49.5
36% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 48.9
8-Core 63.9
7% 56.4 Pts
64-Core 65.9
4% 65.9 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3417) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 10 9.8 10 9.8 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 11.1
Write 12.3
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 9.6
8% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
232GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 67 67 69 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 74.1
Write 40.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 66.7
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPOWER 8006 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Packard IPOWER 8006

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback