HP HPE-520nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-520nl  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 21:19
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$137
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 163
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 453
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 884A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.3
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSLAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 415 408 277 250 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 391
Write 402
Mixed 394
SusWrite 332
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 23.3
72% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 331
248% 331 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 90%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.5 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 12.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 8.6
17% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-520nl Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-520nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback