Asrock A320M-DVS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 17:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 717
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
99GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 110 40 75 74 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 346
Write 131
Mixed 148
SusWrite 73.5
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 21.4
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 172
125% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 97 92 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 96
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 87%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 120GB
66GB free (System drive), PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 31 33 26 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 33.1
Write 30.5
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 29.6
43% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 8.7
868% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 8.8
924% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 140%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.8
Write 31.1
Mixed 4.3
28% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 26.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback