ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3049-A1
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110916
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '22 at 17:06
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 189 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 457 49% 390 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 290 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0492) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.35 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.3 0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM81 128GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 77 79 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 128 Write 121 Mixed 121 SusWrite 78.3 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 12 44% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 79.7 DQ Write 30.2 DQ Mixed 18.3 23% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 50%
Samsung 860 1TB 2,531 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 387GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 79 80 80 80 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.3% Below average	Read 121 Write 120 Mixed 122 SusWrite 80.1 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 22.8 74% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 83 DQ Write 72.3 DQ Mixed 82.7 61% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$60 26,606 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 99 108 109 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 78.2 Write 126 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 102 66% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 85%
WD WD600BEVS-60LAT0 60GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 56GB free Firmware: 6M01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 28.8 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 37.1 24% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback