TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16P7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE63 Raider RGB 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P7  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 03:33
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 658
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 126A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 103
Parallax 7.1
4% 38.6 fps
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.3
8% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADXA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 653 666 668 630 729 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 745
Write 689
Mixed 734
SusWrite 670
160% 709 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 45.7
148% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 613
465% 632 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 145%
 Great: 166%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
519GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 137 144 137 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 141
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 71.3%
 Great: 95%
WD Game Drive 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 100 103 104 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 70
Write 108
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 106
125% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 49.5%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16P7 Builds (Compare 1,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P7

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples830x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples690x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples38x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples643x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples453x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples338x
SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples224x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 167%, 7,253 samples179x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples136x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples333x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples194x
MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 4,193 samples144x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback