HP ProLiant ML350e Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML350e Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory160.9 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 20:34
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 62.3
41% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 405
32% 283 Pts
64-Core 1,492
92% 1,492 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 197 203 194 218 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 135
Write 96
Mixed 149
SusWrite 204
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 13.9
46% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 129
93% 121 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 99%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 263 281 269 289 295 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 279
Write 253
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 276
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.7
16% 5.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 34.4
50% 93.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 91%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
478GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 783 755 327 316 349 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 681
Write 656
Mixed 761
SusWrite 479
145% 644 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 11.5
48% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 287%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 758 780 761 784 800 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 54% Great: 102%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 6.64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1049 983 1003 991 930 967 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 92%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 200 202 193 216 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.3% Below average
Read 212
Write 180
Mixed 210
SusWrite 205
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 8.8
44% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 40
52% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 99%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
54GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 22.2
Mixed 0.3
8% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.1
134% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 713756-081 NOT AVAILABLE 713756-081 NOT AVAILABLE 713756-081 NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE 713756-081 NOT AVAILABLE 713756-081 NOT AVAILABLE 713756-081 192GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.7
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350e Gen8 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350e Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback