Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-V (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '22 at 19:47
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 441 49% 385 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 39.8 Parallax 38.7 33% 39.6 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 42 Splatting 28 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07985 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 92 93 93 92 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 268 Write 91.3 Mixed 114 SusWrite 90.5 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 15.1 63% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 18.7 20% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 99 83 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 98 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 90.1 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 16,472 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	58x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Kingston 9905413-025.A00LF Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 10GBUnknownBench 43%, 16 samples	8x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 50%, 8 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16