Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 928
82% 696 Pts
64-Core 2259
140% 2259 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 111
Parallax 108
84% 107 fps
MRender 83.5
Gravity 112
Splatting 0.1
47% 65.3 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 438 442 445 457 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 361
Write 417
Mixed 360
SusWrite 424
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 35.1
124% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 203
181% 269 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 102%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
458GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 84 88 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 83.6
Write 106
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 85.4
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
124GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 66 67 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 48
SusWrite 66.6
85% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 64%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G1 320GB
7GB free, PID 0225
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 35.1
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 34.3
42% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 0.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 58.3
MC Mixed 55.3
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 143%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback