Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 116 51% 84 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 173 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz) 20,588 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0036) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
980plus 2.5" SATA3-256GB SSD 256GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0918A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 193 11 60 14 16 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 224 Write 204 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 76.9 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 0.4 20% 6.93 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 13.4 DQ Mixed 0.4 5% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 1x4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x

SSD
MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 49%, 3,311 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	4x
9905403-173.A00LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 46%, 212 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $379