Asus G56JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G56JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G56JK
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 468
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 22CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 6.3
3% 8.87 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 310 309 309 311 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 475
Mixed 382
SusWrite 324
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 55.2
187% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
ASMT 2115 500GB
380GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.9 8.5 82 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 90.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 45.7
42% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G56JK Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G56JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback