Zoostorm 7200-0183A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Zoostorm 7200-0183A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '22 at 03:38
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 29.7 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 94.9 32% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 90 8-Core 98 12% 94 Pts	64-Core 95 6% 95 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.1 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 81 46% 65.2 fps	MRender 49.5 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 46.4 43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 868GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 144 156 163 182 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 181 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 160 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10.5 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 257 16% 257 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-0183A Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Zoostorm 7200-0183A

CPU
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	4x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	3x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 16GBSamsungBench 51%, 42 samples	2x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GBHynixBench 50%, 180 samples	1x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Zoostorm 7200-0183A

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Zoostorm 7200-0183A

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)