Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 15:32
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 186
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 521
51% 418 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 37.5
30% 38 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 199 199 201 197 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 468
Mixed 373
SusWrite 226
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 49.7
160% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
265GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 133 136 139 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 136
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
80GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 109 103 96 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 79.6
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 104
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown=> F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $403
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback