Huananzhi Gaming TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi Gaming TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHuananzhi X99-TF Gaming
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 03:50
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 215
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 679
65% 539 Pts
64-Core 2,107
130% 2,107 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 362C) 3GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 70
44% 67.4 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 60.3
57% 71.2 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 301 286 280 273 270 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 324
Mixed 287
SusWrite 290
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 40.6
145% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 248
214% 317 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 128%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
346GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 109 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 120
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 107
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 32.6
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gaming TF Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback