HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 143
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 622
53% 454 Pts
64-Core 2,468
153% 2,468 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 149
78% 116 fps
MRender 86
Gravity 106
Splatting 75.1
72% 89.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1428 1428 1432 1425 1420 1325 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,715
Write 1,413
Mixed 719
SusWrite 1,410
294% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 416
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 356
270% 364 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 212%
Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
157GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1120 457 303 303 304 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 2,057
Write 791
Mixed 725
SusWrite 465
221% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 41
150% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 404
307% 415 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 176%
Great: 280%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
736GB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 137
Write 39.9
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 40.8
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: A280
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 177 173 175 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 184
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 175
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HUS724030ALS640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: A152
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 166 173 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 163
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 170
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 105%
Ibm-xiv ST2000NM0001 A2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: BC42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 131 130 130 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 76.4
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 130
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 32.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback