HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory250.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 10:48
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 200
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 750
68% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,970
122% 1,970 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 412 407 407 418 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 401
Mixed 380
SusWrite 419
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 46.7
130% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 258
195% 262 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 120%
Samsung 870 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 413 407 407 418 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 405
Write 401
Mixed 377
SusWrite 419
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 36.4
108% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 245
188% 255 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 120%
MK0120EAVDT 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: HPG5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 171 175 175 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 122
Write 66.6
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 174
26% 113 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 13.6
45% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 32.7
31% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 41.3
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback