Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L870-16E (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 152 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 200 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 12 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	4.9% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 5.3 5% 6.1 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 5.5 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.9% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 66 71 76 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 66.4 Write 24.6 Mixed 35.1 SusWrite 67.7 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB 8,570 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $52