Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 19 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Intel X79M-S (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '22 at 15:24
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 120 55% 88 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 402 40% 328 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 542 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.2 5% 6.07 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 7.1 5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,494 Write 24.7 Mixed 50.5 178% 856 MB/s	4K Read 235 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.9 362% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB 1,466 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 418GB free Firmware: JPGOA3BF Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,332 Write 19.7 Mixed 37 332% 463 MB/s	4K Read 198 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.7 8,444% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 9300 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 29 Write 27.8 Mixed 28.3 21% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 18.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	90x
Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	35x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSKBench 102%, 33 samples	14x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	58x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	56x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16