Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 15:17
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 47.4
30% 41.2 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 27
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 96 57 55 59 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 445
Write 263
Mixed 112
SusWrite 80.8
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 17
75% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 106
103% 169 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
252GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 73.3
Write 68
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 68.8
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS54757 750GB
95GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 28.3
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $563
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback