Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415JF_X415JF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415JF_X415JF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X415JF
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210603
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '22 at 13:22
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 246 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 520 57% 452 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1EDF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 9 7% 9.87 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 0.2 5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 131 135 140 142 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 776 Write 147 Mixed 226 SusWrite 137 70% 321 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 42.7 165% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 184 137% 185 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 169%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB 2,191 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 24.6 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 39.3 SC Mixed 26 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415JF_X415JF Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415JF_X415JF

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	24x
Pentium 6805IntelBench 55%, 50 samples	4x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	2x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	21x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	9x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	12x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	9x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	4x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	15x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	6x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16