Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 136 2-Core 250 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 669 69% 558 Pts	64-Core 940 58% 940 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 12F5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	7.28% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 119 Parallax 10.4 7% 45.8 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 8.6 8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.28% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	67.8% Good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.5 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 16.4 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	620x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	422x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	214x

SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBBench 389%, 5,529 samples	365x
1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 1TBPhisonBench 300%, 1,236 samples	215x
MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 310%, 6,250 samples	145x

RAM
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples	231x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,443 samples	220x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16