Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 65
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 119
50% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 161
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 255A) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 30.3
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 21.7
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 360 366 363 379 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 483
Write 378
Mixed 377
SusWrite 360
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 19.4
102% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 36.6
71% 138 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
423GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 131 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 129
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-562.A00LF 9905403-562.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback