MSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 06:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 126
57% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 194
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 18.6
15% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 56 56 62 47 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 216
Write 140
Mixed 183
SusWrite 65.9
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 22.5
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 90.1
67% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
830GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 170 169 173 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 80.9
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 168
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1600C9-8GSR 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A58M-E33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback