Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 44 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 91.3 38% 63.9 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 145 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0301 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6708 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.8 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/256GYN 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 189 244 236 246 242 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 351 Write 279 Mixed 262 SusWrite 229 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 18.3 70% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 23.2 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 10.6 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	8x

RAM
123456789012345678 1x8GBABCDBench 24%, 109 samples	7x
123456789012345678 1x16GBABCDBench 22%, 10 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16