Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '22 at 00:51
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 132 54% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 592 46% 409 Pts	64-Core 1,048 65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 157 Parallax 148 136% 157 fps	MRender 168 Gravity 127 Splatting 111 108% 135 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKGF256A5 SATA 256GB 1,243 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 206GB free Firmware: LB1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 241 225 242 251 261 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 388 Write 184 Mixed 302 SusWrite 245 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 25.1 82% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 166 152% 233 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 88%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 505GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1658 1808 1889 2000 1957 1890 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	255% Outstanding	Read 1,683 Write 2,187 Mixed 1362 SusWrite 1867 401% 1,775 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 49.8 159% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 619 DQ Write 486 DQ Mixed 748 506% 618 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 255% Great: 488%
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB 5,131 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 63GB free Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 239 247 250 250 249 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 460 Write 395 Mixed 373 SusWrite 271 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 35.6 117% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 198 147% 195 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 106%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 74 112 121 112 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 163 Write 164 Mixed 52 SusWrite 107 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 130%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 469GB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 117 145 140 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 63.3 Write 102 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 121 58% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 130%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 24GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 20.5 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 11.4 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 3.4 251% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$60 86,372 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 35.2 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 29.6 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	341x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,045

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16