Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS H730 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB274
Memory	21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 190 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 497 54% 426 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Fujitsu(10CF 17AC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 8 Parallax 6.3 4% 6.3 fps	MRender 7.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 211 219 220 203 221 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 458 Mixed 290 SusWrite 228 82% 367 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 48.1 165% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 320 251% 347 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
Jmicron Tech 240GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 223GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 353 351 336 343 339 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 360 Write 358 Mixed 337 SusWrite 351 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 23.1 88% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 95.2 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 140 98% 121 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16.7 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 19.9 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD040F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS H730 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H730

CPU
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	61x
Core i7-4710MQIntel $46Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	21x
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	19x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	114x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	18x
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	6x

SSD
MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 1,578 samples	17x
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	10x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	10x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	46x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,157 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16