Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 218
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 569
57% 462 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B 353E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 76.9
48% 65.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 42.8
43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSTAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 300 209 283 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 405
Write 128
Mixed 270
SusWrite 228
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 33.7
88% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 240
183% 252 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 90%
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 67
Write 68.4
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 75.8
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-064.A00LF 99U5471-058.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback