Terrans X511

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTerrans X511  (all builds)
MotherboardTerrans X511
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 12:20
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 522
58% 455 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6
Clevo(1558 5106) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 54.3
48% 58.8 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 59.3
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 122 116 120 113 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 483
Write 39
Mixed 68
SusWrite 112
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 22.4
93% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 39.6
68% 141 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X511 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Terrans X511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback