Terrans X511

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemTerrans X511  (all builds)
MotherboardTerrans X511
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '22 at 09:44
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 535
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6
Clevo(1558 5106) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 54.3
48% 58.8 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 59.4
49% 59.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 91 100 99 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 461
Write 113
Mixed 132
SusWrite 101
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 23.7
122% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 56.8
88% 174 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X511 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Terrans X511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback