Terrans X511

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemTerrans X511  (all builds)
MotherboardTerrans X511
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 22:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 487
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6
Clevo(1558 5106) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 53.6
46% 57.8 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 59.4
47% 56.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 126 126 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 476
Write 123
Mixed 136
SusWrite 121
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 23.5
120% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 61.9
90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X511 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Terrans X511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback