Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C75
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '22 at 22:16
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 556 66% 510 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SABRENT 1TB 797GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT343.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2279 2299 1352 1049 966 1042 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25 4,291 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 39GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 36 41 35 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 112 Write 5.7 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 38.6 42% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 160% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 112%
ST4000DM 000-1CD168 4TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 1053 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 134 135 134 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 134 Write 106 Mixed 78.6 SusWrite 134 150% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,178 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 24.4 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	875x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	588x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	565x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	712x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	705x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	363x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,026