Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration518 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 139
59% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 358
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
ASRock(1849 5001) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 21.4
10% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 24.5
18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 3X6001T 1TB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 193 189 108 11 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 251
Write 229
Mixed 206
SusWrite 115
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 11.4
46% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 34.2
58% 110 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 94%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
300GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 55 66 64 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 49.2
Mixed 36
SusWrite 56.8
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
20GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 73 89 88 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 99.1
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 77.2
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
663GB free, PID 55ae
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 23 27 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 24
Write 20.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 24
31% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 2.7
222% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback