TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 639
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1311 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 33.2
19% 28 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 26.8
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 21%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,790
Write 4841
Mixed 4,720
1,070% 4,784 MB/s
4K Read 444
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 260
1,121% 307 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 601
467% 651 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
323GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 144 143 142 142 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 140
Write 119
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 142
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 80.8%
 Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
387GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 78 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 98.4
Write 72.4
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 74.5
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 49.6%
 Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 19.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 64.7%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples222x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples177x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples113x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples141x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples120x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples98x
SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples48x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples45x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples37x
RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples231x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples135x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples89x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback