Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 19:35
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 116
2-Core 220
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 588
55% 458 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 19.5
12% 32.4 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 12.6
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,094
Write 1,036
Mixed 1,020
235% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 47.4
154% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 640
467% 600 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK DDR4 8GB 2666MHz 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback