Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 173 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 705 62% 528 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 36 Parallax 46.4 29% 39.4 fps	MRender 47.4 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 36.5 34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: 052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 407 132 402 124 324 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 433 Write 390 Mixed 364 SusWrite 300 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 18.1 99% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 27.4 77% 160 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 750GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 153 155 155 152 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 142 Write 144 Mixed 104 SusWrite 153 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 794GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 167 166 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 164 Mixed 104 SusWrite 165 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 42.6 131% 45.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	5x
SATAIII 1TBIntensoBench 76%, 294 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMT31GR7EFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 101%, 53 samples	4x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	2x
HMT31GR7EFR4C 8x8GBHynixBench 106%, 28 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16